What is it about?

For decades, the UN has failed to mediate a settlement in Cyprus because of a general and profound weakness: it is unable, outside of unity and resolve in the Security Council, to offer direct incentives to parties in conflict that would shape their calculus towards conflict resolution, or to control the actions of third parties in a way that would incentivize conflict resolution or prevent disincentives. In the resulting vacuum, the prospects for peace settlements come to rest largely on domestic politics within the contesting camps and, sometimes relatedly, on the balance of power between them. In the case of Cyprus, the article claims that these weaknesses on the part of the UN were clearly on display during the negotiation process surrounding the Annan Plan (2001-04) and the resumed process that began in 2008 and ended at Crans-Montana in 2017.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The UN in 21st Century Cyprus: Meditration, Mediation-Lite and Beyond, International Negotiation, October 2021, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15718069-bja10043.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page