What is it about?

Measuring the impact of Track Two Dialogues has proven a difficult challenge for the field over many years. Each dialogue is different, which makes a standardized test difficult to achieve. Moreover, different actors wish to measure different things: ‘value’ for money; impact on the conflict; how certain facilitation techniques work; and others. In this paper, we present a model that can be used to measure the impact of a dialogue over time, while also encouraging reflective practice in the field. This “Reflective Practice Model” can be used to provide a ‘snapshot’ of a particular moment, or as a vehicle for the accumulation of a series of such moments, thereby providing a means to observe and measure changes as the dialogue goes on.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Best Practices in the Measurement and Evaluation of Track Two Dialogues: Towards a “Reflective Practice Model”, International Negotiation, December 2020, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15718069-bja10031.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page