What is it about?

The field of peace and conflict studies has been maturing over the past few decades, not least thanks to the continual epistemological contestation between its philosophy and methodology. As a consequence, the methods of conflict resolution practice have been evolving. Dominated by realist approaches of conflict management during the Cold War, the field in the 1990s relied heavily on neo-liberal theories of economic interdependence, democracy building, and interest-based negotiations that can bring win-win outcomes. By the late 2000s, as the constructivist paradigm and critical theory started gaining ground in academia, the conceptual conversation shifted toward the possibilities of building inclusive societies and achieving structural and cultural peace via conflict transformation, rather than resolution, as the respective methodology.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Towards an Inclusive Conception of Best Practices in Peace and Conflict Initiatives: The Case of the South Caucasus, International Negotiation, October 2020, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/15718069-bja10023.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page