What is it about?
This article argues that the International Court of Justice has developed its jurisprudence to avoid applying the non-circumvention principle in advisory proceedings. It identifies five methods used by the ICJ to prevent this principle's application, emphasizing the advisory role's shift towards organizational utility and advancing international public interests.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Advisory Jurisdiction and Consent: the Thin Line between Advisory and Contentious Proceedings, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, June 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/15718034-bja10131.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
Be the first to contribute to this page







