What is it about?

This note first argues that Ch. 869 should be assigned to Aegisthus rather than being reassigned as it has been by some scholars. It also demonstrates that the first interjection in Aegisthus' death-cry (e e) marks his speech as effminate rather than the second interjection (otototoi) as many scholars have argued.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Reconsidering Aegisthus’ Cry at Choephori 869, Mnemosyne, November 2024, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/1568525x-bja10287.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

Be the first to contribute to this page