What is it about?
This essay argues the New Testament was largely recognized (not chosen) by the mid 2nd century and, best we can tell, was closed by the early 3rd. The thesis is defended through an examination of biblical/theological, historical, and manuscript evidence.
Featured Image
Photo by Mark Rasmuson on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The essay offers a unique definition of "closing the canon," and examines a wide range of testimony, not simply patristic citations. At stake is the whole enterprise of New Testament theology and matters such as adding to the canon and what do we make of disputed books.
Perspectives
It was a joy to write on the topic. A more detailed analysis can be found in my book, "40 Questions on Text and Canon."
Scott Kellum
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Case for an Early Formation and Closing of the New Testament Canon, March 2026, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004751071_010.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
