What is it about?

At the outset of maritime trade, ports were integral to urban design, functioning as public architectural works where commerce and social life intertwined. In the emporium port, commercial activities took place in city squares and streets, often within specialized buildings that combined commercial and residential uses. For centuries, ports were depicted as dynamic spaces, with vessels and workers moving through a constantly changing, contested threshold between land and sea. This "border space" became a cultural zone, where both city-dwellers and port workers contributed to a shared identity. Despite modern changes in trade and governance, the essence of the port remains vibrant, continuing to generate a dual dimension—both land and sea—that defines a unique typology of architecture: port-city architecture. This is exemplified by the Fish Markets in Genoa (1933-36) and Naples (1929-35), two examples of Italian Modernist port-city architecture. Built in response to early 20th-century laws regulating fishing and sales, these markets, though no longer in use, embody the rhythm and ritual of port life, with flows of goods and people shaping both the function and form of these spaces. Food markets and maritime stations, positioned at the threshold between city and port, manage these flows and share identity traits, creating public architectures that connect ports, even across different geographical contexts.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Port-City Architectures between Duality and Rituality: Two Fish Markets in Italy, November 2024, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004711174_010.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page