What is it about?

This article is a continuation of the first part published in JEAL 2/1. It explores several proposals of genealogical relationship that link Japanese to other linguistic families. In linguistics, genetic (or genealogical) relationship is the relationship between languages that are members of the same language family. So called "long-range comparisons" (also called distant genetic relationships) are those proposed language families where we deal with results with lower steadiness in the statistical context and where disagreement persists among linguists. This article analyses some speculative long-range comparisons, as well as other short-range attempts to link Japanese to other languages such as Ainu and Korean.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This article shows how not to use certain quantitative approaches to prove language relationship. Although it is not denied that they may have some utility, some authors have misinterpreted the power and scope of these new computational methods, while in most unfortunate cases they have reduced these new techniques to a veritable parody of themselves. On the other hand, this article also discusses some limits of short-range comparisons, including the Koreo-Japonic relationship. It is demonstrated how, more often than not, the evidence in support of these short-range proposals has a too weak argumentative force for related languages given by the absence of stable cognates (related words, that is words having the same linguistic derivation) in basic vocabulary, or the absence of a sufficiently high number of morphological connections, or the absence of "aberrant features".

Perspectives

This article is not an original contribution (albeit it discusses a number of previously unexplored or poorly explored long-range comparisons). However, since long range comparisons are experiencing a period of renaissance (probably due to the growing popularity of these new quantitative approaches), it is important to demonstrate how the history of a given language relationship (in this case Japonic) has been shown, and how not to (mis)use the comparative method.

Georg Orlandi

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The State of the Art of the Genetic Relationship of Japonic: non-Altaic Comparisons and the Fate of Linguistic Isolates, International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics, December 2020, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/25898833-12340033.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page