What is it about?
Why haven’t nuclear weapons been used in major historical crises, and what can we learn from this restraint to prevent nuclear conflict today?_x000D_ _x000D_ This study explores the critical lessons from Cold War crises—like the Berlin and Cuban Missile Crises—when the Soviet Union and the United States avoided nuclear war despite intense confrontations. By examining how these superpowers managed the risk of nuclear escalation, the research sheds light on how strategies like deterrence, clear communication, and arms control helped prevent catastrophe._x000D_ _x000D_ Today, as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine raises the specter of nuclear threats not seen since the Cold War, these historical lessons are more relevant than ever. The paper compares Cold War crisis management with current geopolitical tensions to identify strategies for reducing the risk of nuclear conflict in our time. Ultimately, it highlights how Cold War experiences can guide modern policymakers in navigating nuclear risks and fostering greater global security.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Nuclear Weapons in Crisis Situations, Journal of Applied History, April 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/25895893-bja10046.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







