What is it about?
The results of this study show that to have a clear understanding of both the modality of climate change in the Middle East and the current dominant paradigm, predominant assumptions of the paradigm should be reconsidered. For example, prolonged droughts are part of the natural pattern of climate in the Middle East, although the current drought has not been recorded for at least 100 years. This claim is based on the fact that prolonged droughts in this region can have natural causes, which can be studied as long-term climate trends, although the impact of global warming on the escalation of the Middle Eastern drought is undeniable. However, the exacerbating effect of non-anthropogenic factors on the impact of drought in the region should be studied, too. Additionally, as an epistemological assumption, the term “drying up” (as a new normal and permanent climatic pattern) should be used instead of “drought” (as a normal and reversible pattern) to determine the current climate change situation in the Middle East.
Featured Image
Photo by Parsing Eye on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This article is important because it provides a more accurate understanding of the modality of climate change in the Middle East and North of Africa.
Perspectives
Understanding the true nature of climate change in a large region like the Middle East is not just an epistemological study. Such cognition can also affect decision-making. This article says that the people of the Middle East are facing a new destiny. And they have to adapt to this new destiny.
Nasser Karami
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Modality of Climate Change in the Middle East: Drought or Drying up?, The Journal of Interrupted Studies, June 2019, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/25430149-00201003.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page