What is it about?
One important test of adequacy for a theory of welfare is completeness. To be complete a theory must cover ill-being as well as well-being. Call this the ill-being test for a theory. My aim in this paper is to determine how well equipped the leading theories of welfare are to pass this test. I reach three modest conclusions: (1) passing the test is not straightforward for any theory; (2) on the whole, subjective theories do better than objective ones; (3) within the subjective category experiential theories do better than desire theories.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Worst Things in Life, Grazer Philosophische Studien, August 2020, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/18756735-000108.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page