What is it about?
The Ongwen case, concluded in December 2022 at the International Criminal Court (ICC), convicted Mr. Ongwen of a gender-based act that had never been litigated by the ICC: forced marriage. This article argues that the judge's consideration of forced marriage in Ongwen has settled international criminal law in three important ways. First, it clarified the classification of forced marriage as an ‘other inhumane act’. Second, it recognised and solidified the conduct and harms captured by the term ‘forced marriage’, distinguishing it from other crimes against humanity. Finally, it confirmed that prosecution of forced marriage does not contravene the principle of legality, under which an act must have already been recognized as a crime at the time it was committed. These outcomes will play a key role in future prosecutions of forced marriage in international criminal law. This article suggests that the logical next step is to explicitly list forced marriage as a crime against humanity in the ICC's Rome Statute and the draft Crimes Against Humanity Convention.
Featured Image
Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash
Why is it important?
We explain how the first ever prosecution and conviction of forced marriage in the International Criminal Court took place in the Ongwen case. This groundbreaking case showed that it was possible to address conflict-related forced marriage through a specific crime against humanity, 'other inhumane acts'.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Forced Marriage as the Crime Against Humanity of ‘Other Inhumane Acts’ in the International Criminal Court’s Ongwen Case, International Criminal Law Review, August 2023, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15718123-bja10157.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page