What is it about?

This paper highlights the focus of my monograph, "Judging at the Interface: Deference to State Decision-Making Authority in International Adjudication" (published by Cambridge University Press), and responds to reviewer comments on the book to highlight the role and importance of deference in international adjudication. The paper focusses the concept of "deference" and considers how this concept differs - and intersects - with related concepts such as "justiciability", "restraint", and "restrictive interpretation". It further outlines the situations in which deference will be relevant in international adjudication, including to outline the extent to which the claims to authority by international adjudicators and domestic officials overlap in practice. Finally, it considers the importance of all this to the practice of international law, highlighting how my book "offers a map to navigate through the concept of deference".

Featured Image

Why is it important?

As the paper highlights, my book "Judging at the Interface" aims to bring into the spotlight the contents of international law’s deference “toolbox”. In doing so, it draws attention to the different approaches for analysing deference that have been adopted in international adjudication to date, their doctrinal structure and applicability, and their structural implications for the relationship between the domestic and international legal orders. The inclusive approach adopted in Judging at the Interface ensures that the analysis is not blinkered and limited to any one conception of (or label for) deference. Instead, the framework adopted aims to encompass various approaches to deference to demonstrate how they operate as part of a coherent whole and produce broad systemic impacts. Deference is important both as a tool to secure appropriate respect for domestic decision-making, but for what it reveals about the changing nature and structure of authority in international adjudication.

Perspectives

Writing this paper in response to the considered reviews prepared by the contributors to this symposium was truly gratifying. Having worked on the topic of deference for many years – first in practice, and then as a doctoral and later monograph project – I have appreciated the opportunity to engage with the thought-provoking and varied perspectives showcased in this symposium.

Esmé Shirlow
Australian National University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Deference and the Practice of International Law, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, July 2022, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15718034-12341485.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page