What is it about?

I argue that Aristotle’s arguments in passages regarding chance in the Physics and in passages about ignorance in action in the Nicomachean and Eudemian Ethics presuppose two different uses of ‘for the sake (ἕνεκα) of something’, which are respectively able to explain the wish or thought of agents and the type or nature of what they actually do. In my view, however, this does not commit Aristotle, in the ‘ignorance’ passages from the two Ethics, to holding that the type or nature of what the agents actually do is for the sake of killing or wounding.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Aristotle’s Uses of ἕνεκα, Phronesis, November 2021, Brill, DOI: 10.1163/15685284-bja10049.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page