What is it about?
The article examines various options that scholars have explored in their efforts to construct a history of shamanism. Recognizing Mircea Eliade’s promise that such a history lies in the near future, the article then explores the important ways in which this has been undertaken. It specifies four such ways: with prehistoric rock art, the origins of cultural myths, memory studies, and movements of cultural resistance. Ultimately resisting each of these four options while paying particular attention to the case of early Chinese shamanism, its concluding sections recognize the work of Mircea Eliade and Roberte Hamayon as providing two alternative pathways that might lead into possible constructions of this history, and it then attempts to locate a third way between them.
Featured Image
Photo by Stéfano Girardelli on Unsplash
Why is it important?
I introduce the significance of what we understand by the "history of shamanism," and question if such a history is even possible. I then clarify and evaluate four primary ways that the history of shamanism has been presented in scholarship in the field, showing their various strong points and weak points. I then attempt to construct an alternative understanding of the history of shamanism, which I direct to the phenomenon of Chinese shamanism.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Does Shamanism Have a History? With Attention to Early Chinese Shamanism, Numen, September 2017, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15685276-12341477.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page