Why Complex Problems are Shaped by Ideological Beliefs

What is it about?

This article looks into the concept of complexity and shows how, in the context of design theory, the definitions of complexity pull in opposite directions. It then argues that the cause of this opposition is a logical 'sleight of hand' that Hegel called the determination of reflection. As a result, we can see how complexity serves as a cover for the irrational core of any social system in which a complex problem might be found. The complex problem is then redefined as a symptom of the loss of belief in this irrational core.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The concept of complexity shows how design theory has reached an impasse: after complexity foiled the pursuit of reductive rationalism, it has been condemned to trudge a timid path of pragmatism for want of a means to conceive the social dimension in any substantial form. An ideological concept of complexity offers a path beyond this choice of rationalism or pragmatism.