What is it about?

When studying children, researchers are often limited becuase children may be unable to disclose the information desired - e.g. due to limited understanding of the queried items or limitations in expressing their perception or views. In pediatric epidemiological research, it is thus customary to obtain proxy-reports rather than self-reports, most often from parents or explicitly from the mother. This book chapter describes which aspects of reporting should be considered and why and when it may be a good idea to think about the way data was ascertained.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Because it is such a common problem in studying children, we tend to forget how important the way of data assessment is. Parental proxy-report is undoubtedly the most common solution but it may not always be the best and there may be other feasible options. At least, researchers should scrutinize their questionnaires or interview standards for parts that may be interpreted by e.g. parents other than intended to optimize interpretation of resulting data.

Perspectives

This chapter is part of an interesting book on Pediatric Epidemiology edited by Wieland Kiess, Carl-Gustav Bornehag, and Chris Gennings (ISBN: 978-3-318-06122-2; DOI:10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-06123-9). It was fun to contribute to this compilation of important aspects. Have a look at the other chapters too, they may impact on how you conduct your next study and/or on how you interpret a study of interest.

Prof. Dr. med. Jon Genuneit
Universitat Leipzig

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: How to Deal with Proxy-Reports, November 2017, Karger Publishers,
DOI: 10.1159/000481326.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page