What is it about?

Pre- and post-operative comparative evaluation of neurophysiological tests and clinical trials. Analysis of the diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials (MEP) induced by a magnetic field after supraspinal stimulation.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Clinical neurophysiology and neuroimaging focus on different aspects of spinal root damage. Neurophysiological tests detect functional pathology, while neuroimaging detect structural pathology. Each of the these tests is characterised by different benefits and limitations. Tests comparing MRI sensitivity to neurophysiological tests show that neuroimaging is more sensitive in diagnostics of patients with cervical radiculopathy; however, clinical neurophysiology tests are more specific in reference to clinical trials. It is therefore believed that these two diagnostic methods may be highly complementary. Neurophysiological tests should be implemented when there is a discrepancy between the results of MRIs and clinical trials.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy, BioMed Research International, May 2019, Hindawi Publishing Corporation,
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4576493.
You can read the full text:

Read
Open access logo

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page