What is it about?

This paper investigates how autonomous mobile quadrupedal robots impact perceived safety of individuals. We leverage the methodology of physiological signal analysis, autonomy, and social science to piece together a complete picture of participant experiences. The findings offer insights into how people respond to single versus multiple robots, sitting alone versus together, and robots performing search versus navigation behaviors.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

As mobile robot autonomy continues to advance into our everyday communities, it is imperative that the designers and engineers behind these systems progress towards community acceptance. This paper also highlights the value of the interdisciplinary research in a way that can encourage others to undertake similar interdisciplinary approaches. Ultimately, the combined findings paint a holistic picture of participant perceived safety to the quadrupeds that otherwise would not have been possible. These findings can be utilized in the design and deployment of community embedded robotics towards acceptance.

Perspectives

The transdisciplinary nature of this study was extremely eye opening and rewarding. The varied data types and perspectives offered a lot of valuable and interesting interplay towards conclusions unavailable through a single approach. I hope that researchers -- especially STEM researchers like myself -- see this and look in their own community for collaboration with people who they wouldn't have initially approached and worked with.

Ryan Gupta
University of Texas at Austin

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Indoor Human–Mobile Robot Encounters: A Transdisciplinary Study on Perceived Safety, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, May 2026, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery),
DOI: 10.1145/3803850.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page