What is it about?

This paper investigates users' attribution of blame among different entities (e.g., the negligent user, the service provider) following a data breach, and discusses the implications of blame attribution for (pre and post security breach) risk communications.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Attribution of self-blame and self-responsibility has been noted to be a predictor of positive coping response behavior following a negative incident (such as a data breach). Despite being widely studied in psychology, healthcare, and other domains, this relevant construct is comparatively less investigated in the field of usable cybersecurity. This can give a new perspective on how end-users assign responsibility of account security and how they would likely react following a security breach. Would they feel that service providers are the solely responsible stakeholders for their account security, or do they (the end-users) share responsibility for protecting their accounts? Understanding blame attribution following a data breach can help increase our knowledge of user security behavior and how end users will react/take care of their account security following a security breach. The paper includes a discussion and implications of the findings in pre- and post-security breach risk communication.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Divergences in Blame Attribution after a Security Breach based on Compliance Behavior: Implications for Post-breach Risk Communication, October 2023, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery),
DOI: 10.1145/3617072.3617117.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page