What is it about?

PRISMA is a commonly used reporting guideline for systematic reviews but no study was conducted to evaluate the views from the users (i.e. authors) perspective, this study is the first one to look at this.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It provides a users' perspective for different items of PRISMA and will be useful for further improvement.

Perspectives

By conducting this online survey, I have the chance to contact different investigators through emails. It is a special experience.

Wilson Tam
National University of Singapore

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey, BMJ Open, April 2019, BMJ, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026271.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page