What is it about?
Heart attack is often managed by putting a stent in the arteries to the heart and has sparked debates on profit-driven overuse medicine. We report the case of a 55-year-old man with a heart attack who came to our internist team for a second opinion as cardiologists insisted on stenting his arteries even when he was symptom free. We review the literature on this topic and explain how this would not only put the patient on a potential journey toward bankruptcy but also how this would have no potential benefit to the patient.
Photo by Claudia on Unsplash
Why is it important?
There is a blossoming heart disease industry due to increasing demand for heart stents in India, which has the world’s highest death rate from heart diseases among developing nations. The high rate of heart diseases and the increasing need for heart stents provides an opportunity to evaluate its appropriate use and highlight potential overuse. In this paper, we have also discussed the consequences of overuse of these heart stents, and current lack of shared-decision making between physicians and patients along with misconceptions about the true beneficial effects of heart stents among both the patient and physician community.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Middle-aged man who could not afford an angioplasty, BMJ Case Reports, March 2019, BMJ, DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227118.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page