What is it about?
In this article, we explore whether conventional turbofan engines can improve their efficiency by replacing constant-pressure combustion with a constant-volume combustion (CVC) system. We analyze how this change could reduce fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions, while also assessing the potential impact on the formation of NOx, one of the main aviation pollutants. We use performance and emissions models to compare a conventional engine with a CVC engine on medium-haul flights.
Featured Image
Photo by Renato Rodrigues on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study is important because it lays out a realistic path toward more efficient and sustainable aircraft engines, a crucial challenge for modern aviation. What makes it unique is that it goes beyond the theory of CVC, but directly compares it with commercial turbofans under real-flight scenarios, including design optimization to balance emissions, efficiency, and thrust. Implicitly, it offers insight into how emerging technologies could help meet increasingly stringent environmental regulations and advance toward cleaner aviation.
Perspectives
Working on this study was particularly motivating because it allowed us to challenge the limits of a design that has dominated aviation for decades: the conventional turbofan. For me, the most valuable aspect was seeing that innovative ideas like constant-volume combustion are not only viable in models, but can also deliver concrete benefits in efficiency and emissions reduction. I hope this work inspires others to continue exploring new engine architectures that will enable a future of more sustainable flight.
Dr. Ramon Fernando Colmenares Quintero
Fundación Berstic and Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Feasibility Study of a Conventional Turbofan With a Constant Volume Combustor, January 2009, ASME International,
DOI: 10.1115/gt2009-59097.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
