What is it about?
The discipline of economics started as a moral science but became detached from moral concerns over time to emulate natural science and to adopt positivism. Consequently, mainstream economics assumes people to be sordidly selfish. The teachings of Islam, however, promote social preferences where individuals should be other-regarding and have preferences over social outcomes. This paper replaces the selfish agent with a social agent and presents the results in a theorem referred to as the third fundamental theorem of welfare economics (TFTWE). The TFTWE states that “when the selfish agents are replaced with the social agents, market outcomes are Pareto optimal, equitable, and unique”. This is an important result which has widespread implications. We show that the TFTWE holds under conditions where the first two fundamental theorems of welfare economics fail and that a Walrasian equilibrium is more likely to exist when selfish preferences are non-convex. Unlike the popular convention, there is no equity-efficiency trade-off. In fact we point to the possibility of reversal in equity-efficiency trade-off.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It shows the value addition of morality and challenges the most celebrated results in economics.
Perspectives
I have been thinking about this idea for quite some time. As a student it did not feel right to accept morality as an inefficient proposition. The main results in mainstream economics seems to be artifacts of the model driven by key assumptions behind the model.
Hayat Khan
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Islamic economics and a third fundamental theorem of welfare economics, World Economy, May 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12508.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







