What is it about?

Agricultural input subsidies have been used to increase food production and food security in Africa, including Botswana. The paper shows that the agricultural Input subsidy programme in Botswana has increased cereal area planted, yields and production, and hence, may have increased food security. However, the program is costly to taxpayers since public expenditure on input subsidies is about twice the value of crops produced. The paper concludes that the input subsidy program in Botswana is therefore unsustainable and should be redesigned as a poverty reduction program targeting resource poor farmers rather than a universal programmme.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The paper is important in that it adds to the literature on how input subsidies have helped smallholder farmers in Africa and the rest of the developing world. It is also meant to influence public policy debate on the design of input subsidies in africa, their effectiveness and sustainability.

Perspectives

This article is detailed, and most of its sections are written in a simple language, making the information readily accessible to readers from different disciplines. I encourage you to read it - you will gain a lot of information on input subsidies in Africa

Dr Tebogo Bruce Seleka
Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Old wine in a new bottle? Impact of the ISPAAD input subsidy program on the subsistence economy in Botswana, Review of Development Economics, August 2021, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12824.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page