This shareable PDF can be hosted on any platform or network and is fully compliant with publisher copyright.
These are the author's replies to comments by Grant Lamond, William Lucy, and Maksymilian del Mar to the book The Tapestry of Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and its Role in Legal Argument.
This page is a summary of: Replies to Critics, Ratio Juris, November 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/raju.12188.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page
Journal of Pragmatics
Numerous investigations into the opioid pandemic have shown that collaborative, conflict-free partnerships between patients and physicians help reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing. However, the...
The Antitrust Bulletin
Our brains are wired to make us susceptible to things that sound true but aren't, and this same pre-programming makes it hard for the truth to push out the fiction. We explain the economics that m...
Journal of Pragmatics
It is crucial for comics readers-viewers to correctly judge characters' emotional states, as these are key drivers in the development of narratives. There are various ways in which artists can conv...
