What is it about?

Purpose: Evaluate the importance of orientation of multifocal lens designs with angular increments of addition. Methods: Optical properties of one monofocal and three multifocal designs were analysed with the visual Strehl ratio (VSOTF) metric through-focus (1 to 5 D). Designs were tested in combination with the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of 782 subjects (1564 eyes). Simulations included one monofocal, one bifocal (eight orientations), one trifocal (four orientations), and a 4-foci design (four orientations). Monocular and binocular performances of all designs were assessed by computing the area under the through-focus VSOTF plots, the through-focus range of acceptable optical performance, and, for binocular combinations, optical disparity between left and right eyes. Results: Under monocular conditions, bifocal designs generated larger areas under the through focus VSOTF than trifocal designs and 4-foci designs. Specifically, bifocal designs divided vertically were optimal for 48% of eyes. Trifocal designs and 4-foci designs offered longer intervals of acceptable through-focus vision. Coma and spherical aberration values were correlated with the optimal orientation of multifocal corrections. The best binocular combination was achieved with a monofocal and a trifocal lens. The orientation of a multifocal design with angular areas affected the final optical properties of the combination (lens plus eye). Conclusions: The optical aberration distributions for our population of physiologically normal eyes demonstrated improved performance for some lens design orientations (i.e., left-right segments for 2-zone bifocals). Taking into account the HOAs of healthy patients, with special attention to coma and spherical aberration, will increase the optical quality of angularly divided multifocal solutions.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The study presented in this manuscript serves two main purposes:1- to show the clinician that physiologically normal eyes have a level of HOA that allows for the customisation of the orientation of angularly segmented multifocal profiles, and 2- to show manufactures which designs to prioritise when limited resources are available and deciding what lenses should become part of their product family.

Perspectives

This paper provides a quantitative evaluation of the potential gains to be achieved by orientation control of added angular multifocals as well as the gains achieved by combining different angular designs in a modified monovision format. Information that can be applied to the optimisation of current designs (M-plus family, Oculentis and Lenstec SBL-3, Lenstec) and helps with the development of future multifocal contact and intraocular lenses with angularly increasing additions.

Pablo De Gracia
Midwestern University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Optimal orientation for angularly segmented multifocal corrections, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, August 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12402.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page