Featured Image
Why is it important?
This is a contribution to the discussions of ethnomethodological and Wittgensteinian approaches to mind, thought, and other supposedly internal states and occurrences.
Perspectives
I take (and defend) an agnostic position on internal states, one that is somewhat less radical than Coulter's neo-Witgensteinian denial of the existence of such states.
Professor Jack Bilmes
University of Hawaii System
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Referring to Internal Occurrences: A Reply to Coulter, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, September 1992, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00219.x.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
