Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, September 2011, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04231.x.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
