What is it about?
One of the most important views in the recent discussion of scepticism about knowledge is Neo-Mooreanism. Its adherents argue that we can know a lot of the ordinary things we think we know, and that we can thus refute scepticism.This paper argues that George Edward Moore was not a Moorean in this sense. This paper follows Moore's views of what the sceptical problem is and how one should respond to it through a series of crucial papers with the main focus being on Moore's 'Proof of an External World'.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
There is a lot of talk about Neo-Mooreanism these days but little attention to the interesting and important different views Moore himself had. These views can give impulses to the current discussion of epistemic scepticism.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Was Moore a Moorean? On Moore and Scepticism, European Journal of Philosophy, June 2009, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00300.x.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page