What is it about?
This paper is a meta-analysis of articles describing phylogenetic analyses of various taxa, that shows that almost all the time, the results of "maximum parsimony" are the same as those from "maximum likelihood" or Bayesian analyses of the same data set.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The paper refutes the common claim that model-based approaches to phylogenetic inference outperform analyses based on cladistic parsimony.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Do model-based phylogenetic analyses perform better than parsimony? A test with empirical data, Cladistics, November 2010, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00342.x.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page