What is it about?

This discussion of Aufhebung and sublation explores different approaches to understanding the nature and integrity of determinate events, their relation with diversely conceived contending principles and the clarifying light afforded by the horizon of either Absolute Spirit or absolute transcendence.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

By comparing and contrasting the approaches adopted by Hegel and Lonergan, we develop a vantage on some of the broader questions confronting western cultures. How might we possibly affirm complete intelligibility in the face of contingency, randomness and surds? How could we locate human freedom and autonomy within world process? How might we understand meaning that is ‘surplus’ to its mode of communication? How might we understand and assess the distinction between world process as the expression of Absolute Spirit and world process as participation in absolute transcendence?

Perspectives

This article has prepared me to compare the complementary approaches taken by Hans Urs von Balthasar and Bernard Lonergan to transposing Thomas Aquinas' corrective synthesis of Plato and Aristotle in the service of contemporary theological reflection.

Gordon A Rixon
University of Toronto

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Locating Hegel'sAufhebungand Tracing Lonergan's ‘Sublation’, The Heythrop Journal, February 2016, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/heyj.12323.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page