What is it about?

Contemporary global finance follows a similar organisational logic to the global production of goods. On the example of the asset management industry we discuss, however, fundamental differences between the production processes of goods and finance. First, we challenge the somewhat misleading definition of ‘value’ and value creation with regard to (speculative) finance. Second, we show how complex, opaque financial products - e.g. the proliferation of private contracting - require ever more specialized work, and subsequently new knowledge work to bridge the resulting fragmented financial production.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

We suggest an alternative, more systemic way to study contemporary finance's specifics and its mutual dependencies with its 'host economies', i.e., financial centers. Thus, we illustrate how such an approach helps to better comprehend the nature of a fiercely competing financial industry and specifically scrutinize the interplay between global financial institutions and locally (re)shaped business environments in financial centers.

Perspectives

We need new theoretical perspectives that employ additional insights in the multi-scalar, multi-sequential, and multi-agent interactions in the reiterative process of the world's financial production. We argue that the global production network (GPN) approach allows us to study the global finance's deeply fragmented nature, including its proneness to jurisdictional arbitraging, from a more systemic, integrative angle.

Dr Sabine Dörry
Luxembourg Institute of Social and Economic Research

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Geographies of Industrialised Finance: Probing the Global Production Networks of Asset Management, Geography Compass, January 2016, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12256.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page