What is it about?

This article analyses the impact of the euro crisis on national parliaments and examines their response the limitation of their budgetary autonomy. It argues that the debt crisis has provoked the emergence of new channels of parliamentary involvement in EU economic governance (e.g. rights of approval in the European Semester, strengthened accountability of national governments, reinforced budgetary scrutiny, improved access to information, creation of new interparliamentary forums). In these respects, they have undergone further Europeanisation and this represents an embryonic step in the parliamentary adaptation to the nascent EU fiscal regime. Yet national parliaments are unlikely substantially to influence EMU policy making, because of the democratic disconnect inherent in the EU’s multilevel constitution.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This is important because it shows that national parliaments were not passive in the euro crisis but that at least some of them have strongly reacted to the limitation of their powers. This to some extent nuances the orthodox view that the euro crisis has been detrimental for democracy.

Perspectives

This is one of the most comprehensive analyses of the status of national parliaments after the sovereign debt crisis. It is based on a wealth of empirical data and builds on the key scholarly works in this field of EU law.

Dr Davor Jancic
Universiteit van Amsterdam

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: National Parliaments and EU Fiscal Integration, European Law Journal, March 2016, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12172.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page