What is it about?
Despite the scholarly popularity of important developments of political communication, concepts like soft news or infotainment lack conceptual clarity. This article tackles that problem and introduces a multilevel framework model of softening of journalistic political communication, which shows that the 4 most prominent concepts—(a) sensationalism, (b) hard and soft news (HSN), (c) infotainment, and (d) tabloidization, and, additionally, (e) eroding of boundaries of journalism—can be distinguished in a hierarchical model. By softening, we understand a metaconcept representing developments in political journalism that are observed on different levels of investigation, from journalism as a system (macrolevel) down to single media items (microlevel).
Featured Image
Why is it important?
There is a lot of noise in the literature on a) sensationalism, (b) hard and soft news (HSN), (c) infotainment, and (d) tabloidization. This article clarifies and defines these concepts, so future research can be more clear on it.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Softening of Journalistic Political Communication: A Comprehensive Framework Model of Sensationalism, Soft News, Infotainment, and Tabloidization, Communication Theory, November 2016, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1111/comt.12102.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page