What is it about?

Ee aim to use robust datasets of small mammals along the entire forest system to disentangle the main drivers for diversity along this gradient. We aim to disentangle whether deforestation (recent), biogeographical variables, including 19 bioclimatic variables (historic), or historical trapping bias best describe patterns of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversities using small mammal assembles, from northeastern Brazil to eastern Paraguay.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Although all dimensions of biodiversity are correlated, they have unique information and should be considered individually to better understand biodiversity and inform conservation strategies. We found that fragmentation is impactful at a local scale and becomes less important at a biogeographical scale. Therefore, climatic variables drove biogeographical faunal patterns for all clades, probably reflecting important historical assembly process at large spatial scales.

Perspectives

Phylogenetic diversity or functional diversity should be used as biodiversity metrics for conservation and management along with taxonomic diversity, as these metrics may improve predictive ecosystem sustainability and evolutionary divergence in anthropogenically modified landscapes.

Dr Ricardo S Bovendorp
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz - UESC

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Disentangling drivers of small mammal diversity in a highly fragmented forest system, Biotropica, January 2020, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12745.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page