What is it about?
Neoclassical growth models are frequently used to gauge the potential effect of public debt on long-run income. However, the conventional methods used for calculating the burden of public debt do not provide a closed-form solution to the long-run output-debt relationship. Our stock approach fills this gap in neoclassical growth theory by establishing a direct link between steady-state output and debt that holds independent of whatever assumptions are made about household behavior.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Our results deliver two crucial implications. First, the enormous differences in private saving rates and population growth rates, observed across the world, lead to vast differences in the burden of public debt among countries. Second, the burden of debt in developed countries, characterized by a high saving rate and low population growth rate, is rather small even at a debt level of 90 percent. Therefore, paying down public debt in these countries does not seem to exert a serious impact on the evolution of long-run income, at least according to neoclassical growth models.
Perspectives
Our output-debt equation can provide a further theoretical basis for future empirical research in the field.
Dr István Dedák
Eszterhazy Karoly Egyetem
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR DETERMINING THE BURDEN OF PUBLIC DEBT IN NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODELS, Bulletin of Economic Research, June 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/boer.12125.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







