Some of the content on this page has been created using generative AI.
What is it about?
The article explores the critical role of gender-affirming care in meeting the medical and psychosocial needs of transgender and non-binary individuals, while highlighting significant evidence gaps, particularly the long-term effects of puberty blockers and hormone therapy, and the lack of standardized outcome measures. Despite advancements in understanding gender-affirming care, uncertainties about hormone therapy's long-term impact and its potential cancer risks persist. Additionally, there is a need for more research to provide validated patient-reported outcomes and standardized data reporting. The article also discusses potential cardiovascular and skeletal health risks associated with gender-affirming treatments, stressing the necessity for further studies to better understand these risks and inform policy for safe medical care access.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This research is significant because it highlights the critical gaps in our understanding of gender-affirming care, particularly regarding the long-term effects of pubertal blockers and gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). As the medical community continues to develop and refine healthcare strategies for transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals, addressing these evidence gaps is crucial. The findings emphasize the importance of standardizing outcome measures and conducting comprehensive studies to ensure that gender-affirming care is both effective and safe. Furthermore, the research is timely given the socio-political debates surrounding access to gender-affirming care, underscoring the need for evidence-based policies to support TGNB individuals' health and well-being. Key Takeaways: 1. Evidence Gaps: There is a pressing need for research into the long-term effects of puberty blockers and GAHT, as current literature lacks comprehensive data on these therapies' implications, including potential cancer risks. 2. Cardiovascular and Skeletal Risks: Studies indicate potential increased cardiovascular risks for transgender women on estrogen therapy and concerns about bone mineral density in TGNB youth using puberty blockers, highlighting the need for further investigation and management strategies. 3. Standardization and Outcomes: The lack of validated, standardized measures for patient-reported and surgical outcomes in gender-affirming care hampers the ability to fully understand and improve these healthcare practices, necessitating more research and consensus in this area.
AI notice
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Bridging the evidence gap in gender‐affirming care: urgent research needs, BJU International, June 2025, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/bju.16783.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
Be the first to contribute to this page







