What is it about?
Although the end of the Cold War meant fewer constraints on humanitarian intervention, U.S. leaders continue to shy away from protecting innocents outside of the United States from harm. This is despite the fact that presidential candidates often campaign on restoring America’s moral lead in the world and, in particular, on U.S. responsibilities to avert mass atrocities. Hagan’s Logic of Political Explanation aids in understanding why, once in office, a president’s initial response is to avoid the controversy of a risky involvement. When this strategy fails, he shifts to a strategy of legitimating a policy of intervention and/or to a strategy that insulates his foreign policy choice from domestic political pressures. Hagan’s model facilitates in understanding the role of the domestic environment, especially regarding political opposition and the public’s attitude toward a crisis, in shaping presidential decision making on humanitarian intervention.
Photo by Christopher Skor on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Understanding when the United States intervenes militarily for humanitarian reasons.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: When Does the United States Intervene Militarily for Humanitarian Reasons?, Politics & Policy, April 2015, Wiley, DOI: 10.1111/polp.12111.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page