What is it about?

Sociologists have shown that the classic civil rights movement in the South sprang from local communities whose resources were mobilized to challenge segregation. This article shows how social networks worked to facilitate and hinder mobilization. Church leaders could be rivals as well as allies and their charismatic style could require status acknowledgement rather than an immediate pooling of resources. The article illustrates this with reference to the Montgomery bus boycott.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Social capital as a concept popularized by Robert Putnam presents itself simplistically as either "bonded" in groups with strong internal identities or "bridging" between distinct groups. This article explores how the supposition that segregated African American communities were rich in bonded social capital neglects tensions within them even at times of insurgency and needs to consider how preexisting social network dynamics dictate mobilization tactics.

Perspectives

A critical application of social capital theories to African American history.

Emeritus Professor Peter John Ling
University of Nottingham

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Social Capital, Resource Mobilization and Origins of the Civil Rights Movement, Journal of Historical Sociology, June 2006, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2006.00278.x.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page