What is it about?
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the proposed algorithm by authors and five others [2]. A system of criterion for comparing of algorithms for prioritising traffic in 6LoWPAN proposed. Studies of the six algorithms performed and complex estimates based on the data obtained. The arithmetic and geometric complex estimation proves that the suggested by authors algorithm for the prioritisation of traffic in 6LoWPAN is better than others investigated.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Comparison of traffic prioritisation algorithms mainly based on the results of Delay, Throughput , Packet Delivery Ratio and Packet Loss Ratio. This comparison made for a specific type of traffic, for certain end nodes. This method of comparison cannot provide a comprehensive comparative evaluation of the different traffic prioritisation algorithms
Perspectives
The comparison according to the above criteria bases on average arithmetic and average geometric estimation. The choice of geometric and arithmetic mathematical dependence defined as optimal in terms of cogency, normality and comparability. Errors in unit indicators estimates using geometric and arithmetic dependence provide compromise enforcement to the conditions for maximum sensitivity when deterioration of single indicators for quality and minimal sensitivity to errors in their determination.
prof. Veneta Panayotova Aleksieva
Technical University of Varna
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Comparative Analysis of Traffic Prioritisation Algorithms in 6LOWPAN Networks, June 2020, Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE),
DOI: 10.1109/siela49118.2020.9167116.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
