What is it about?
The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether top management will assume their liabilities especially when financial restatement occurs, and,based on the “effective supervision theory” and “strategic cooperation theory,” to examine whether an institutional investor is a supervisor or a cooperator considering the management turnover caused by financial restatement in the companies.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This paper expands literature of the institutional investors in the corporate governance area and provides a basis for future research in the area of the institutional investors’ governance effect. It divides financial restatements into fraudulent financial restatement and other financial restatement and examines the relationship between financial restatement and abnormal management turnover so as to provide evidence about whether the management will assume their responsibilities when there is financial restatement in the company. It also tests whether the institutional investors will play supervisor’s or cooperator’s function in state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Is institutional investor a supervisor or cooperator?, Nankai Business Review International, March 2018, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/nbri-02-2017-0007.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page