What is it about?

The authors examine the relationship between leader-member exchange (LMX) and the selection of upward influence tactics. The purpose of this paper is to integrate research on perceptions of justice, LMX, and influence tactics in order to empirically test an integrative model. Coalition strategies were used more when subordinates experienced poor relationship quality with their supervisor. The research suggests that perhaps for individuals experiencing poor relationships with the supervisor, coalition strategies might present an alternative to “rational” influence tactics (which are used more in high-quality relationships).

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The current study extends LMX research by examining differing subordinate influence strategies in high- and low-quality relationships. It also extends organizational justice research by examining the effects of the interpersonal implementation of fair procedures on the dynamics of leadership and upward influence.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Justice perceptions, leader-member exchange, and upward influence tactics, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, September 2016, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/lodj-02-2013-0021.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page