What is it about?

Retail property investment performance is not random; it changes over time and within structured cycles which argues that understanding the drivers of those patterns leads to better decisions. Over the past decade, shopping centres have lost favour with institutional investors. Some of this decline can be attributed to the fact that some performance benchmarks create false signals, especially over time. This paper demonstrates that shopping centre performance, proxied by the NPI retail returns, varies in terms of direction and magnitude across market periods and regimes. These patterns are statistically significant and fundamentally inconsistent with the random-walk assumptions built into conventional benchmarks. Using spline-based analysis applied to monthly NPI retail returns, the study demonstrates that performance is driven by time-varying market fundamentals and behavioural processes adopted by investors, rather than baseline noise. The practical implication is direct: investors who ignore regime structure and rely on smoothed aggregate benchmarks risk acting on false signals, a risk that is amplified at turning points in the cycle. More accurate, regime-sensitive performance measures would improve capital allocation decisions across the shopping centre sector and may result in improved performance within real estate portfolios.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Shopping centre investment regimes, resilience and returns Part I: the fundamentals of the market, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, September 2026, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/jpif-06-2026-0117.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page