Effectiveness of AML Regulations

What is it about?

This paper aims to provide a macro analysis of the USA’s anti-money laundering (AML) legislation. In examining the context and consequences of these regulations, a general determination can be made on the effectiveness of the current US AML legislation. The major AML regulations in the USA are covered under the Bank Secrecy Act, USA Patriot Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control. It is difficult to determine what constitutes as implementation and maintenance of effective AML Compliance Programs because US federal AML requirements remain largely dynamic. This paper will provide some context to why certain major AML regulations were established as well as the reasoning behind their implementation. This paper will then attempt to determine the effectiveness of current AML regulations, particularly on the banking sector, by looking at several cases of alleged failure to maintain effective AML Compliance Programs. An examination will be conducted on HSBC’s $1.9 billion settlement in 2012 to the US government, as HSBC failed to establish a reasonable AML program according to the US Department of Justice press releases.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

A determination as to whether US AML regulations need strengthening or is too strict in that it causes adverse effects. A macro analysis of America’s AML legislation is severely needed. Many papers on the issue lack a thorough description of the large-scale socio-economic effects of the AML programs of American financial institutions.

Perspectives