What is it about?

Widely hailed, this article argues that the so-called “historic turn” in management and organizational studies is in fact an historic wrong turn, a turn marked by mislabeling, misrepresentation, confusion and a strange reluctance to even acknowledge – let alone defend – underlying theoretical positions. Such confusions lead, in turn, to misunderstandings relating to “facts” (i.e. things that exist independently of our fancy), “evidence” (i.e. the medium through which I ascertain knowledge of a fact, be it a full or partial knowledge) and “interpretation” (i.e. the ways in which I connect evidence to explain an historical outcome).

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The historic (wrong) turn in management and organizational studies, Journal of Management History, August 2020, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/jmh-06-2020-0037.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page