What is it about?

This study suggests that regional health authorities in spite of being politically governed organisations have the potential to execute a formal priority-setting process. Evidence from three of the sites shows that most decisions on disinvestments were possible to implement, although the initial targets were not always fully achieved. The accomplishment was in many ways unique to Sweden – it increased the dialogue between political and professional leaders on the necessity of restrictions.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Formal priority setting in health care: the Swedish experience, Journal of Health Organization and Management, September 2016, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/jhom-09-2014-0150.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page