An analysis of literacy differences related to the identification and dissemination of misinformation in Japan

What is it about?

This study explores the relationship between different types of literacy and the identification and dissemination of misinformation to develop effective countermeasures. Utilizing data from a large-scale survey, we constructed models to evaluate how various literacies impact the ability to recognize inaccuracies and influence dissemination behaviors. The findings reveal that individuals with high subjective literacy, characterized by self-perceived critical thinking abilities, are less effective at recognizing misinformation. In contrast, those with higher scores in information literacy, media literacy, and objective critical thinking measures are less likely to disseminate misinformation. This research is novel in its quantitative analysis of how various literacies relate to the judgment and dissemination of misinformation across multiple fields beyond the commonly studied areas of politics and healthcare. It underscores the importance of objective literacy measures and cautions against overreliance on subjective assessments of one's own literacy. Additionally, the study examines different dissemination methods, offering practical insights for crafting more effective misinformation countermeasures.

Featured Image