What is it about?

Student learning materials are becoming highly multi-modal in character and the paper questions whether such materials do assist students to develop their critical literacy. Academic disciplines within the university may vary strongly in their perspectives on how students' critical and creative abilities should be fostered and the paper gives a means by which various academic points of view on this may be reconciled.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The paper suggests how Ong's (1982) writing on literacy and orality provides a practical means to assist scholars to better understand their teaching role.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Reading against and writing back, English Teaching Practice & Critique, December 2015, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/etpc-06-2015-0049.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page