What is it about?
This paper evaluates competing explanations for the greater prevalence of informal employment in some countries rather than others. These variously explain informal employment to be a result of either economic under-development and the lack of modernisation of governance (‘modernisation’ theory), higher taxes and too much state intervention (‘neo-liberal’ theory) or inadequate government intervention to protect workers from poverty (‘political economy’ theory). To do this, an International Labour Organisation data base produced in 2018 on the prevalence of informal employment in 112 countries (comprising 90 per cent of the global workforce) is analysed, and macro-level economic and social conditions reflecting each of these theories tested using bivariate regressions.
Photo by giovanni cardone on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The prevalence of informal employment ranges from 94.6% of total employment in Burkina Faso to 1.2% in Luxembourg. Evaluating the validity of the competing theories, neo-liberal theory is refuted, and a call made to synthesise the modernisation and political economy perspectives in a new ‘neo-modernisation’ theory that tentatively associates the greater prevalence of informal employment with lower economic under-development, greater levels of public sector corruption, smaller government and lower levels of state intervention to protect workers from poverty.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Why is informal employment more common in some countries? An exploratory analysis of 112 countries, Employee Relations, August 2019, Emerald, DOI: 10.1108/er-10-2018-0285.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page